Finally, Credit Where It’s Due

Welcome to another Friday, chief!

In today’s edition — The Supreme Court just gave businesses a tax-time treat, meaning no more dipping into cash flow to make pre-deposits for GST appeals; use input tax credit instead. Meanwhile in Bhopal, a ₹1 GST overcharge on a bottle of water turned into an ₹8,000 headache. 

SC Allows Use of ITC for GST Appeals

Vishwas Ved

Here’s some welcome news for businesses dealing with India’s tax system: the country’s top court has just made it easier as well as cheaper to challenge GST demands.

In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court ruled that companies can now use their input tax credit (ITC) to cover the pre-deposit required to file GST appeals.

Until now, businesses had to deposit cash even when they had plenty of tax credit from past purchases. 

This business-friendly move not only frees up cash, it also brings clarity to all disputes related to GST.

What’s This All About?

Under the existing GST rules, if a business challenges a tax demand, it can file an appeal but only after depositing a certain percentage of the disputed amount upfront. The deposit is aimed at discouraging frivolous appeals.

The problem with this system was that the rules stipulate that the deposit needs to come from their ‘cash ledger’ — money directly from the pocket — rather than their ‘credit ledger’ that records the input tax credit i.e. the GST already paid on purchases.

This mandatory deposit made it hard for businesses, especially small and medium enterprises (SMEs), to challenge GST demands without affecting their cash flow.

What Changed It

This issue hit a tipping point when tax authorities asked Yasho Industries, a Mumbai-based specialty chemicals company, to deposit ₹3.36 crore to dispute a tax demand, even though the company had enough ITC to cover it.

The company first challenged the tax demand in the Gujarat High Court, arguing that a 2022 circular from the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) should allow them to use ITC for the pre-deposit. The court sided with the company, ruling that mandatory appeal deposits are a form of tax liability.

But there was a loophole in the circular: it only mentioned ITC being used for ‘output tax liabilities’ (i.e., tax on sales), not explicitly for appeal deposits. 

The Revenue Department held onto it and pushed back, insisting that pre-deposits were only procedural and had to be paid in cash.

The matter eventually reached the Supreme Court, which has now settled it for good. A bench ruled in favour of Yasho Industries, saying that pre-deposits qualify as tax obligations, and therefore ITC can be used to pay them.

Final Words

The ruling has not only given relief to Yasho Industries, but also cleared many years of confusion around whether input tax credit can be used for pre-deposits as well.

The court’s ruling has ensured that businesses, especially SMEs, do not get financially burdened when a tax demand comes their way.

At the same time, the court has also made refunds easier because if, for instance, the business facing tax demand wins the appeal, there’s no delay in reclaiming funds.

Help us improve CFO Weekly Digest! Share your thoughts in this quick survey to shape content that truly matters to finance leaders.

Water Bottle Takes Eatery to Court Over ₹1

Welcome to a courtroom drama, featuring… a pricey bottle of water.

It all started in 2021 when a restaurant in Madhya Pradesh charged ₹1 as GST on a bottle of water, only to find itself in hot water. That’s right — just ₹1.

Nearly four years later, Bhopal’s Consumer Forum has ordered the restaurant to pay up ₹8,000 for charging GST on the bottle that costs ₹20.

Here’s the full story:

One fine day in 2021, the petitioner, Aishwarya, the hero the world didn’t know it needed, had eaten with her companions at the restaurant.

When the bill arrived, she discovered she had been charged ₹29 for the bottle that had ‘MRP ₹20’ printed on it. She objected to the additional charges, but the restaurant insisted the billing was legal. 

Not one to let water go under the bridge, Aishwarya dragged the restaurant to the consumer forum. The restaurant argued that it charged a GST of ₹1 and the extra charge of ₹8 was for “services” such as air conditioning and chairs.

The court was unconvinced, ruling that GST was included in the MRP. The forum not only ordered a refund of ₹1, but also slapped the restaurant with a penalty of ₹5,000 for mental agony and ₹3,000 for legal expenses.

Moral of the story?

In India, you can get away with poor service and stale food, but overcharge a customer even by ₹1, and you could be looking at four years in court and a penalty about eight thousand times the crime.

1500

The number of employees PwC axed in the US. With this, it has become the latest of the Big Four accounting firms to announce a significant workforce reduction in the US, confirming that approximately 1,500 roles—around 2% of its 75,000-strong American workforce—are being cut. The redundancies are concentrated in the firm’s audit and tax units. The move underscores mounting pressure on professional services firms grappling with sluggish demand and unusually low staff turnover.

Sebi resolves 4,239 complaints. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has resolved a total of 4,239 investor complaints through its online grievance redressal platform, SCORES, in the month of April. During the month, Sebi received 4,341 new complaints. As a result, the total number of unresolved complaints stood at 4,263 at the end of April, up slightly from 4,161 complaints pending as of March 31. SCORES, or the Sebi Complaint Redressal System, is an online platform that enables investors to file and track complaints against listed entities and Sebi-registered market intermediaries.

KPMG’s AI tool for tariff risks. KPMG has rolled out a new tool designed to help clients navigate a complex trade and tariff landscape. The tool, powered by generative artificial intelligence, allows users to simulate potential tariff scenarios and visualise impacts on global supply chain operations, among other capabilities. Global consulting firms are ramping up their use of AI to boost internal capabilities while also enhancing the services they provide to enterprise clients. Last month, KPMG integrated AI agents into Clara, the firm’s global smart audit platform. That move will enable more than 95,000 auditors globally to automate routine tasks.

Get a clear policy on Bitcoin: SC to Govt. The Supreme Court has asked why the Centre couldn't formulate a clear cut policy on regulating cryptocurrency. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh termed the Bitcoin trade as an illicit trade more or less like “hawala” business. “Why does Centre not come out with a clear cut policy on regulating cryptocurrency? There is a parallel under-market for it and it can affect the economy. By regulating the cryptocurrency, you can keep an eye on the trade,” the court said.

Alzheimer's diagnosis with blood test. The USFDA has approved the first-ever in vitro diagnostic device that tests blood to aid in diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease. Set to launch in June 2025, the test offers a faster, more accessible, and less invasive alternative to PET scans and spinal taps, especially for people showing early signs of memory loss and cognitive decline. It has been granted “Breakthrough Device” designation, reflecting its potential to significantly improve Alzheimer’s detection and care.

ICYMI | Documents Burn, Tax Bill Survives

Missed last week's update? Patna High Court rejects a travel agency’s fire excuse, ordering ₹25.25 lakh in service tax despite lost records, citing suppression of facts. Meanwhile, Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma rechristened GST from “Gabbar Singh Tax” to “God-Sent Tax,” claiming it helped buy Rafales and S-400s. From courtrooms to political battlefields, taxes are no longer just about revenue; they’re part of the national story now.

Was this email forwarded to you?

The CFO Weekly Digest is a weekly newsletter brought to you in collaboration with The Core.